Do Referees Face Liability for Their Decisions in Sports Contests?

By Jill L. Yonkers   The doctrine of assumption of risk is a familiar one in the sports-torts arena. The general rule is that an athlete assumes the normal, commonly appreciated risks associated with playing his or her particular sport. It cannot be used to...

Ski Resort’s Assumption of Risk Argument Takes a Spill

A federal judge from the Middle District of Pennsylvania has denied a ski resort’s motion for summary judgment in a case in which a woman sued the company for negligence after a skier collided with her, while she watched her husband and kids take skiing lessons....

Plaintiffs Strike Out Again on Foul Ball Case

The Supreme Court, Nassau County has concluded that patrons at a Long Island Ducks baseball game assumed the risk of injury as a result of a foul ball and that the defendant discharged its duty of care.   The plaintiffs William May and Jodi May commenced an...

Court Grants Summary Judgment to MSG in Premises Liability Case

A New York state court judge has granted summary judgment to Madison Square Garden (MSG) in a case in which the owner of the facility was sued by a patron, who slipped and fell after attending a basketball game.   In so ruling, the court found that the plaintiffs...

The Reclassification of Football

Part 1: The NFL   By Andrew M. Blecher MD   Collision sports are full-contact sports with a greater than average risk of injury. They include sports such as football, rugby, ice-hockey, mixed-martial arts and boxing. But there is something different about...

Court: Concussed Athlete Assumed the Risk of Injury

A district judge from the Western District of Pennsylvania has ruled that a cheerleader can amend her lawsuit, which claims that her coach all but ignored past concussions and forced her to participate in dangerous stunts.   At the time of the incident, plaintiff...