By Joseph M. Ricco IV
UNLV starting quarterback Matthew Sluka has made waves by deciding to redshirt the remainder of the 2024 college football season and leave the team, citing unmet promises regarding his Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) compensation. Sluka, who transferred from Holy Cross to the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, led the Rebels to their first 3-0 start in 40 years before announcing his decision to step away. According to Sluka, financial commitments made during his recruitment were not upheld, sparking controversy over the lack of formal agreements in the NIL landscape. While UNLV claims no formal contract was in place beyond a $3,000 relocation stipend, his representatives argue that a verbal promise of $100,000 was made. This situation is drawing attention not only for its impact on UNLV’s season, but also for its broader implications in college football, where disputes over NIL agreements are becoming more common. This article will break down the details of Sluka’s decision, explore precedent in this area, and examine how this move could shape the future of NIL in college athletics.
The Fallout
After transferring to UNLV from Holy Cross for the 2024 season, Sluka was expected to be a key player for the Rebels, helping lead the team to an impressive 3-0 start, which included wins over Big 12 opponents Houston and Kansas. However, Sluka announced that he would redshirt the remainder of the season and leave the team, following a dispute over NIL compensation. His representatives claim that an assistant coach verbally guaranteed him a $100,000 NIL deal, though he only received a $3,000 relocation stipend upon joining the program. UNLV has since denied the existence of any formal agreement for the larger sum.
This situation is emblematic of the growing challenges surrounding NIL deals in college athletics. Since the NCAA began allowing student-athletes to profit from their name, image, and likeness in 2021, there has been little regulation or oversight in how these agreements are structured and enforced. In Sluka’s case, the lack of a written contract led to conflicting accounts between his representatives and UNLV’s athletic department, raising concerns about the accountability of verbal promises in the NIL era. UNLV maintains that Sluka’s demands for further compensation violated the NCAA’s “pay-for-play” rules and Nevada state law, while Sluka’s side insists they were merely seeking the fulfillment of what was initially promised.
Ultimately, Sluka chose to redshirt, preserving his final year of eligibility, and leave the UNLV program. His decision allows him to explore other opportunities, likely through the NCAA transfer portal, once it opens in December. By taking this route, Sluka not only steps away from the team midseason but also sends a clear message about the importance of upholding NIL agreements. This unprecedented move by a starting quarterback midseason has drawn national attention, with many viewing it as a sign of potential changes and challenges ahead for college football in the NIL landscape.
Precedent for NIL Disputes
The controversy surrounding Matthew Sluka’s departure from UNLV is not the first time an NIL agreement has led to a public breakdown between a player and a university. A notable precedent occurred in 2023 when former high-profile recruit Jaden Rashada found himself in a similar dispute with the University of Florida. Rashada, a highly touted quarterback, had initially committed to the Gators after reportedly being promised a massive NIL deal worth $13 million. However, when the deal collapsed and the promised money wasn’t delivered, Rashada requested a release from his letter of intent, ultimately transferring to Arizona State. The situation sparked widespread discussions about the need for greater regulation and oversight of NIL agreements in college sports, highlighting the vulnerability of verbal promises and the potential for conflict when those promises go unfulfilled.
Rashada’s case, much like Sluka’s, points to the growing tension between athletes and institutions in the NIL era. Both situations reveal the lack of formal contracts and legal frameworks that protect players from broken agreements, leaving them with limited recourse when promises are not honored. While NIL was intended to empower student-athletes and allow them to profit from their own brand, the lack of oversight has created a “wild west” atmosphere where deals can easily collapse, as seen with Rashada and now Sluka. These high-profile cases have prompted calls for stricter rules, including mandatory formal contracts and legal protections for student-athletes entering NIL deals.
Loopholes and Vulnerabilities
NIL deals today are largely informal because NCAA rules prevent schools from directly offering players compensation contracts. Instead, third-party collectives, which operate separately from the schools, oversee these agreements. These collectives often rely on verbal promises or informal arrangements, which don’t offer the same level of protection as formal contracts. As a result, athletes may not receive the compensation they were promised, leading to disputes like Matthew Sluka’s.
Since schools cannot directly handle NIL deals, players have limited options when these promises aren’t upheld. Without formal contracts in place, athletes like Sluka and Jaden Rashada have little legal recourse if they don’t receive the agreed-upon compensation. This creates uncertainty for student-athletes, who must rely on the word of collectives without binding agreements. As NIL continues to evolve, many are pushing for clearer regulations and stronger protections to safeguard players from these risks.
Redshirting: A Tool for NIL Negotiations
Looking to the future, the redshirt rule may increasingly become a tactical advantage for athletes navigating NIL disputes. Matthew Sluka’s decision to redshirt and leave UNLV has set a new precedent for how players can protect their eligibility while negotiating or contesting NIL agreements. By sitting out midseason, athletes like Sluka can maintain their leverage without losing a year of eligibility, signaling a shift in how athletes manage their NIL contracts and team commitments.
As this tactic becomes more common, schools and NIL collectives will likely face growing pressure to deliver on their promises or risk losing key players at critical moments in the season. The ability to redshirt and transfer gives athletes considerable control, pressuring programs to meet their NIL commitments to retain talent. Without stronger protections and formal agreements in place, this emerging trend could disrupt the stability of teams and further complicate the already unpredictable nature of college athletics.
The Sluka situation reflects a broader transformation in college football, where athletes are gaining more control over their futures. With the use of redshirting as a strategic tool, it becomes even more important for schools, collectives, and governing bodies to formalize NIL agreements and provide clearer protections. As these dynamics evolve, both players and institutions will need to adapt to ensure a more balanced and secure environment in college football’s rapidly changing landscape.
Joseph M. Ricco IV is a junior Sport Management and Government double major at the University of Texas at Austin. Joseph is actively involved as a Texas Longhorns Football Recruiting Operations Intern and currently works with Pro Football Focus as a Data Collector. He also has experience as a Training Camp Operations Intern with the Kansas City Chiefs. Joseph aims to leverage his sports management and legal knowledge to pursue a career in football administration.
References
Henderson, B. (2024, September 25). As Matthew Sluka proves, Jaden Rashada was the first but not the last bad nil deal. Hail Florida Hail. https://hailfloridahail.com/posts/as-matthew-sluka-proves-jaden-rashada-was-the-first-but-not-the-last-bad-nil-deal-01j8n0bqjgpq
Hughes, G. (2024, September 25). UNLV QB Matthew Sluka’s intention to redshirt, enter transfer portal draws cries for Nil Reform. 247Sports. https://247sports.com/longformarticle/unlv-qb-matthew-slukas-intention-to-redshirt-enter-transfer-portal-draws-cries-for-nil-reform-236881072/
Hummer, C. (2024, September 25). UNLV QB Matthew Sluka’s sudden redshirt, intent to enter transfer portal is a major shift in college football. 247Sports. https://247sports.com/article/unlv-qb-matthew-slukas-sudden-redshirt-intent-to-enter-transfer-portal-is-a-major-shift-in-college-football-236883533/
Kelly, D. (2024, September 25). UNLV QB Matthew Sluka’s Nil Holdout: A new trend in college football? DraftKings Network. https://dknetwork.draftkings.com/2024/09/25/jason-fitz-gojo-golic-unlv-qb-matthew-sluka-redshirt-nil-compensation/
Leuzzi, J. (2024, September 25). UNLV athletics issues statement after Matthew Sluka opts to redshirt remainder of season. USA Today. https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/ncaaf/2024/09/25/matthew-sluka-unlv-statement-rebels-football-nil-dispute/75380961007/
Morales, A., Ubben, D., & Hamilton, B. (2024, September 25). After 3-0 start, UNLV QB Matthew Sluka to sit rest of season over nil payment dispute. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5793011/2024/09/25/matthew-sluka-unlv-redshirting/
Olson, M. (2024, September 25). QB Matthew Sluka leaving UNLV: What we know and what’s next. ESPN. https://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/41438443/qb-matthew-sluka-unlv-rebels-nil-dispute-next
Schoen, D. (2024, September 25). UNLV QB’s decision to redshirt over nil dispute could set trend. Las Vegas Review-Journal. https://www.reviewjournal.com/sports/unlv/unlv-football/unlv-qbs-decision-to-redshirt-over-nil-dispute-appears-unprecedented-3176876/?utm_campaign=widget&utm_medium=latest&utm_source=post_3171075&utm_term=UNLV+QB%E2%80%99s+decision+to+redshirt+over+NIL+dispute+appears+unprecedented
Sports, F. (2024, September 25). Why is UNLV QB’s decision to redshirt a big deal? here’s what you need to know. FOX Sports. https://www.foxsports.com/stories/college-football/why-unlv-qbs-decision-transfer-big-deal-need-to-know
Vessels, C. (2024, September 25). Scott Van Pelt on Matthew Sluka, nil promises: “there are no cops to enforce rules which don’t exist.” On3. https://www.on3.com/nil/news/scott-van-pelt-on-matthew-sluka-nil-promises-there-are-no-cops-to-enforce-rules-which-dont-exist/
