O’Bannon: How NCAA Witnesses Established ‘The Less Restrictive Alternative’ to Their Restraints

Nov 28, 2014

By Jeff Birren   NCAA members and professional sports leagues are incapable of producing a product without an agreement. The participants must agree on the sport that is being contested, and from that flow a myriad of rules that regulate the contest and its participants. In such instances, Federal circuit courts have long-held that Sherman Act rule-challenges are subject to the “flexible Rule of Reason.” The Supreme Court agreed in American Needle, Inc. v. National Football League, 560
This content is for subscribers only. Please subscribe or log in to read the rest of this article.

Articles in Current Issue