By Elijah Shelton
The National Football League (NFL) uses a franchise tag system to allow teams to keep key players who are about to become free agents. Introduced in 1993, this system prevents players from signing with other teams by locking them into a one-year contract (Robinson). While it was intended to help teams retain important talent, the franchise tag has led to several high-profile conflicts between players and teams, with athletes often forced into short-term agreements that don’t reflect their actual value or long-term potential. Critics argue that this limits players’ freedom and can create uncertainty in their careers, especially when they are tagged multiple times. On the other hand, proponents of the system argue that it helps teams maintain competitive rosters and avoid losing players too quickly to free agency. This essay will examine whether the NFL should reform its franchise tag policy.
- Analysis
The NFL’s franchise tag system presents considerable challenges to player welfare by limiting earning potential and long-term career stability. While it may appear beneficial in the short term, the franchise tag primarily favors teams, leaving players like Saquon Barkley in challenging positions. For example, Barkley’s 2023 franchise tag salary of $10.1 million is significant (Bromberg). Still, it falls short of the multi-year contracts secured by players like Christian McCaffrey, who signed a four-year, $64.06 million deal, or Alvin Kamara, who earned a five-year, $75 million contract (Reineking). As Saquon Barkley is seen as a premier running back, this franchise tag is a disservice to his potential earnings. This highlights the financial limitations imposed on players under the tag, forcing them into year-to-year contracts that hinder the warranted long-term financial growth.
The harm of the franchise tag becomes even clearer when injuries occur. A notable example is former Dallas Cowboys linebacker Anthony Spencer. After a breakout 2012 season, Spencer was tagged for $8 million and again for $10 million in 2013 (Jones). However, a knee injury early in the 2013 season cut his career short, preventing him from securing the long-term contract he deserved. Had Spencer been offered a multi-year deal, he could have enjoyed more financial security after his injury.
The franchise tag system is especially detrimental in light of the NFL’s average career length of just 3.3 years (Gough). Many players hit their peak in their mid-20s to early 30s, and a long-term contract would offer much-needed financial security for them and their families. The physical demands of the sport make it difficult for many players to reach a second contract, making the franchise tag even more harmful. As Pittsburgh Steelers defensive lineman Cameron Heyward stated, “You put a guy on a one-year contract, and if he gets hurt, he’s screwed” (Saunders).
In addition to financial concerns, the franchise tag can also affect team morale and individual player well-being. Players on the tag often feel undervalued, as they are placed in a cycle of “prove-it” years (Logue). This dissatisfaction led to high-profile holdouts, such as Le’Veon Bell’s decision to sit out the 2018 season. Bell felt unappreciated under the franchise tag, stating, “I just want to be valued where I’m at” (Heifetz). This tension harms individual players and can disrupt team dynamics and chemistry.
Although the franchise tag is meant to give teams flexibility and help with the NFL’s competitive balance, its negative impact on players is undeniable. It limits a player’s earning potential, creates long-term financial insecurity, and hinders an athlete’s potential motivation to perform at an elite level. As such, this current franchise tag system is flawed and needs reform.
- Recommendations & Solutions
Several potential reforms to the NFL’s franchise tag system could better balance player rights with team control. These include (1) eliminating the franchise tag, (2) limiting the use of multiple franchise tags on the same player, and (3) introducing a tiered system based on tenure. While these changes would require negotiations with the NFL Players Association (NFLPA), they would give players greater control over their careers while allowing teams to retain key talent in a fairer, more structured way. Originally designed to help teams retain star players, the franchise tag has evolved into a system that restricts player movement and prevents fair negotiations. These reforms should be considered to help the NFL create a system that values players.
The first recommendation is to abolish the franchise tag entirely. This would give players complete control over their careers, allowing them to enter unrestricted free agency and explore better opportunities. Unlike in the NBA and MLB, where no franchise tag exists, and players can negotiate long-term deals, the NFL’s franchise tag forces players to accept one-year contracts, limiting their earning potential. Eliminating the franchise tag would foster a more competitive market in which players are rewarded for their talent and teams are encouraged to offer fair, long-term contracts.
Removing the franchise tag would also address the NFL’s salary imbalance. Currently, the tag allows teams to keep players at below-market rates by paying only the average of the top five salaries at the position (Williams). Without the franchise tag, teams must negotiate multi-year contracts, boosting player salaries. This change could also reduce contract disputes, such as the Le’Veon Bell holdout, by ensuring contracts are negotiated through mutual agreement rather than imposed.
Moreover, abolishing the franchise tag would provide players with financial and physical protection. Football is high-risk; one-year contracts expose players to career-ending injuries without long-term security. By eliminating the tag, teams could continue negotiating one-year or long-term deals with player consent. This would modernize the NFL’s contract system and align it with the free-agency structures in other major sports leagues.
The second recommendation is restricting teams from using multiple franchise tags on the same player. Currently, players tagged more than once receive a substantial pay raise—120% of their previous salary for the second tag and 144% for the third (Reineking). While these increases might seem appealing, they still limit players’ ability to negotiate long-term contracts, as they remain locked into one-year deals. Moreover, the raises may not reflect the player’s market value in free agency. Limiting the franchise tag to a one-time use would incentivize teams to negotiate fair, multi-year contracts, provide players with a more straightforward path to unrestricted free agency, and allow teams to retain a key player for one season. This reform would promote stronger player-management relationships, as teams would no longer be seen as exploiting the system. By doing so, the league would foster greater trust and ensure a more equitable system in which players can secure contracts that better reflect their worth, rather than being repeatedly tagged.
The final recommendation is to introduce a tiered franchise tag system based on a player’s tenure with the team. Currently, the franchise tag does not account for a player’s tenure with the team, treating all players equally regardless of their loyalty or contributions. By implementing a tiered system, players with longer tenures (e.g., 5+ years) would receive higher franchise tag salaries than those with shorter tenures. This would better reward veteran players for their loyalty, ensuring that they are fairly compensated for their sustained contributions. By providing better financial recognition to veterans, this reform would create a more equitable contract negotiation process, ensuring that player loyalty is valued.
The strongest solution would be abolishing the franchise tag entirely. While this may be the most challenging change, recent media discussions suggest it could be closer to reality than expected. Removing the franchise tag would give players more control, allowing them to negotiate long-term contracts and secure financial stability.
- Conclusion
In conclusion, while the NFL may defend the franchise tag to retain key talent, ongoing criticism and analysis demonstrate the need for reform. The franchise tag restricts players’ ability to negotiate fair contracts, often leading to disputes and limiting their earning potential. Originally designed to protect teams, the system now hinders player mobility and market value. By either eliminating the franchise tag, reforming its current policy, or introducing a tiered approach, the NFL could foster a more equitable system that prioritizes player autonomy and fairness. These reforms would benefit players and the league, making the NFL more competitive and player-focused.
Elijah Shelton is a third-year law student at Santa Clara University School of Law. His interests include sports law, with a particular focus on athlete representation.
Works Cited
Bromberg, Nick. “Saquon Barkley, Giants Agree to 1-Year Deal for 2023.” Yahoo! Sports, Yahoo!, 2023, sports.yahoo.com/rb-saquon-barkley-and-giants-agree-to-1-year-deal-for-2023-112052778.html.
Gough, Christina. Average NFL Career Length | Statista, 2024, www.statista.com/statistics/240102/average-player-career-length-in-the-national-football-league/.
Heifetz, Danny. “Gronk, Le’veon Bell, and the Biggest Story Lines of the NFL Offseason.” The Ringer, 2019, www.theringer.com/2019/02/06/nfl/offseason-story-lines-leveon-bell-antonio-brown-rob-gronkowski-kyler-murray.
Jones, Lindsay H. “Cowboys Franchise Anthony Spencer Once Again.” USA Today, Gannett Satellite Information Network, 4 Mar. 2013, www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/cowboys/2013/03/04/anthony-spencer-franchise-tag-gerald-sensabaugh/1962791/.
Logue, Ian. “Transcript: Damien Harris’ Interview with Theathletic’s Robert Mays.” PatsFans.Com, 10 June 2024, www.patsfans.com/patriots/blog/2024/06/09/transcript-damien-harris-interview-with-theathletics-robert-mays/.
Reineking, Jim. “NFL’s Highest-Paid RBS: See Full List of 2023 Running Back Salary Rankings.” USA Today, Gannett Satellite Information Network, 5 Dec. 2023, www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/2023/08/11/highest-paid-running-backs-nfl-2023-salary-rankings/70510562007/.
Robinson, Sam. “NFL Franchise Tag Recipients since 2013.” Pro Football Rumors, www.profootballrumors.com/2024/03/nfl-franchise-tag-recipients-since-2013. Accessed 17 Feb. 2025.
Saunders, Alan. “Steelers Daily Links: Ravens, Jackson in Standoff; New FA DT Target.” Steelers Now, 24 Feb. 2023, steelersnow.com/steelers-daily-links-ravens-jackson-fa-dt/.
Williams, Craig. “Vikes Views: Who Would You Franchise Tag?” Daily Norseman, Daily Norseman, 18 Feb. 2025, www.dailynorseman.com/2025/2/18/24368071/vikes-views-who-would-you-franchise-tag#:~:text=The%20Exclusive%20Franchise%20Tag%20is,of%20the%20player’s%20previous%20salary.
